I lean left on issues of equality and civil liberties and honestly am continually disappointed with the people who represent the republican party. You don't have to attack people to get your point across regardless if you are democrat or republican. I enjoy writing, and I enjoy debating people but this left a bad taste in my mouth I'm done for awhile. Like not even 5 minutes after I posted, one of the resident commenters with almost 4 thousand upvotes just laid into me and started attacking my personal character, not only that someone flagged my comment as spam and it's been almost 12 hours and it is still under review. I tried commenting on a post of about Bill Maher being an Islamophobe and was immediately called a right winger, and a bag of crap for trying to defend him. The whole thing had a daily beast vibe only the website is not as flashy. Most of the subscribers are Caucasians who act like they are somehow champions of the liberal world like being tolerant is a competition. There is a clear bias, and it depressing how people attack each other in the comment section. I have to say I'm not impressed, don't expect a rational discussion. I heard about from Robert Reich a man I respect immensely. ![]() Most news sites have their fair share of problems, but Alternet is a particular egregious example of what happens when you drink the far-left Koolaid a little too often and exercise zero editorial standards. ![]() It is one of the most poorly moderated echo-chambers I've ever seen, and that's saying a lot in 2022. Any comment that discusses factual information or commentary that may be at odds with said-article is spammed and downvoted by fake bot accounts and Disqus sock-puppets. The worst part, however, is the general userbase giving commentary. Even Fox News has something resembling a grasp on reality: Alternet makes Breitbart look like NPR in regards to overall writing standards and self-awareness, and that is pretty disturbing. In addition to all other requirements for submitting an application for Accreditation, the Provider will submit to CCCEP:Ĥ.1 A signed statement from the translator and/or the reviewing bilingual pharmacy or other professional on the prescribed form to confirm the French or English translation accurately depicts the original accredited Learning Activity andĤ.2 A copy of the translated Learning Activity for CCCEP records.What kind of left-leanng news website reports on precisely zero articles about the current POTUS Joe Biden? Everything on this website is about ex-President Donald Trump or someone in the Republican Party and then hyperbolizing whatever is being said into an end-of-America scenario, typically illustrated with a mix of weird editing choices and bad grammar to match. ![]() If the translator is not a pharmacy or health professional who is familiar with health terminology, a bilingual pharmacy or other health professional must review the English or French translation and certify that the translation accurately reflects the content and clinical relevance of the accredited version of the Learning Activity, and uses appropriate medical terminology.Ĥ. If a Learning Activity is translated from English to French, or vice versa, the translator of a CCCEP accredited Learning Activity will certify that the English or French translation corresponds in every respect to the original French or English version of the Learning Activity that was accredited.ģ. Learning activities may be accredited in English or French.ġ.1 Learning Activity content related materials (i.e., activity content, Learner Assessment) may be submitted in English or French.ġ.2 Required forms (e.g., Disclosure/COI form, Checklists) will be completed in English, unless otherwise approved by CCCEP.Ģ. Guideline I: Language of Submission and Translation of an Accredited Actvitiyġ.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |